Allen King’s 4-Man Gang Bang W/ Dylan James, Max Arion and Jeffrey Lloyd

-

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Three of Lucas Entertainment’s biggest, hardest, and roughest cocks are standing alert and ready to fuck Allen King rough, raw, and without mercy in his not-so-innocent little ass. Dylan James, Max Arion, and Jeffrey Lloyd are all packing major equipment in the pants, and they have a pretty good idea what Allen is up to when he invites them to party with him at a gay club in Spain. The three Lucas Men take turns making Allen King squirm as they sodomize and breed his ass!

?NEW
"Allen King’s 4-Man Gang Bang"??????‍???‍?@Reyallenking @XXXDylanJames @JeffreyLloydXXX @MaxArionxxx
?Coming February 15th 2020 at @LucasEnt pic.twitter.com/SkZQU6GL0a

— MIGUEL SOLO (@miguelsolo611) February 10, 2020

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

25 COMMENTS

  1. Max WAY out in front for me – such a hot and hung stud,
    followed by Dylan,
    then the other 2 (who are both fine looking guys)

    • Oh, fuck off. There IS a limit to tats before they become, well, distracting is far too mild a term. King has some ink but he’s still beyond gorgeous. And Max isn’t too far gone (his ears, on the other hand, are a bit much–but he can’t really do much about that). Apparently, Jeffrey Lloyd has just gotten on the tat express; most of his pics on the Lucas site, including his primary pic, show only a few tats–certainly not that blazing thing on his side. But Dylan James? No. The only thing that could make him more unappealing would be if he were ramming a skewer through his cheek.

      And how about you chime in when you see one of the anti-Lucas brigade pops in? There are a couple of guys who REGULARLY pop in with things like “Lucas, ugh” and “Lucas–can’t stand anything from them.”

      If YOU like looking at tat addicts, fine. That’s entirely on you. There are some of us, though, who do not like the OVERDOING it. Just like the manscaping thing. I’ve been on here long enough to see plenty of “men” who whine “real men have hair” and “I don’t like little boys” because a guy chooses to shave his body hair. And, of course, there are the guys who hate uncut dicks (and, conversely, the guys who hate cut dicks)–folks that I don’t believe I’ve seen you attack. For me, too much ink is a turn-off. And, since I’m paying my membership fees for this site, I’ll express my opinion any goddamn time I feel like regardless of what *some* self-proclaimed comment monitors feel should be expressed here. (And no, I’m not “mad” or “angry”–at least, no more so than you are with your pissy attitude. I’m simply responding to your “angry” comment. It was, after all, YOU who decided to bring up the “anti-tattoo gang” comment into the fray. And I chose to respond. Frankly, they’d all be more beautiful WITHOUT the excessive tats. But, à chacun, son goût.)

      • I see you got that cape that I sent you because you’re super mad & as for your thesis of a response you posted. You can fold it in half, shine it up real nice & stick it up your ass.

      • I was really, really tempted to not comment on this exchange because:

        1. I’m tired of them. Period.

        2. I’m tired of trying (emphasis on TRYING; and likely not succeeding as often as I’d like, if ever) to be a voice of reason. And there seems to be very little appetite for an exchange of ideas or opinions on here. It’s “here’s mine, you have yours, let’s not interact at all, unless we agree”. Daily Squirt representing a LOT of what’s wrong with the world in microcosm.

        3. Alharlee and joeynmtgy8 seem pretty well matched, and not at all close to engaging in the juvenile, name calling, cursing out, troll like behaviour that’s gone on on here before.

        However, I am commenting (obviously), because:

        1. Joey, NOBODY is paying to view or comment on Daily Squirt (as far as I know). It is obviously connected to Squirt.org, but I’m certain that you don’t have to be a paid member on there or even a non-paying member to set up a user ID for Daily squirt and comment away. And if a Squirt.org membership is required, I know it doesn’t have to be a paid one. (Just for the record, I do have a paid Squirt.org membership). Your comment, and similar ones I’ve read from others over the past couple of years, are incorrect. Let’s get rid of this idea of “I’m paying for my right to do this” – you have the right to do it because it’s open to anybody and we’re lucky enough to live in countries allowing free speech.

        2. I want to say that I feel strongly that Alharlee makes a valid point. I’ve noted for a while that the guys who dislike ink seem to be increasing in their vehemence and need to comment on it what feels like E V E R Y S I N G L E T I M E a guy with tattoos makes an appearance. Yes, you guys who dislike ink have every right to your opinion and to express it, but what gets accomplished by making the same comment every single time? Put another way, you’ve made your point – move on.

        3. The other characteristics Joey mentions: cut vs uncut, hairy vs smooth, etc, etc, and I’ll add “staring at the camera”, and the guys who have added hairstyles and beards to what they’re critiquing; what I just said about the ink comments could just as easily be applied to these. There’s no need to REPEATEDLY say it. And regarding the anti Lucas comments, I’ve been asking for reasons when I see them for a while now – as far I know, I haven’t had a response. Keep making your comments guys, but others have the right to respond. I don’t feel that Alharlee is at all a “comment monitor”. Hornlakecocksucker (if I remembered that ID correctly) was a “comment monitor” and I perceive a big difference between the two guys’ comments. I think Alharlee’s expressing his opinion of your’s and other’s opinions – fair game in my book – and you can respond, also fair game in my book (preferably, as long as you both stay away from the juvenile and troll like antics we’ve seen on here – just my preference for commenting, obviously I’m not telling you what to do – I don’t have that right). Just because he has an opinion on the anti ink guys, why should he have an opinion on the anti cut or anti uncut guys – maybe they’re not getting to him. And maybe I’m wrong but I’ve never seen Alharlee start a comment with “joeynmtgy8….” – i.e. he’s not going after you personally, he’s making it generic – you’re responding as if he was attacking you personally.

        4. I’ve said it once before and I’ll say it again: there are times when guys on here – I’m not directing this exclusively or even primarily at you Joey – act like the proverbial cat on a hot tin roof. I don’t know why and I don’t care to. Just relax guys. It’s porn. It’s supposed to be a lighter, stress free few minutes of the day when you come on here.

        Cheers, guys & peace….

        • thank you very much for that comment hrychstlver69, it was very to the point and appropriate and you are correct no one pays to use daily squirt. if you have a paying membership to squirt.org that is a completely different site, yes they are linked but dailysquirt is a free site.

  2. WOW! The debate rages on! This is better than the weeks we spent watching Tump’s impeachment.
    Just for the record I like the guy with the big ears– despite the big ears.
    And if the truth be told, I’d be blessed if any one of these guys even bothered to look at me twice.

  3. joey, you don’t have to view these pictures, you have probably been rejected so many times, that is has turn you pitter! get a life, after seeing your profile, no wonder guys bail on you!!

  4. Wow. So much feed back. Look beyond the inked skin…There s SOO MUCH more to focus on of this raw testosterone pack of WOOOOOOF. Throw me into that RUTT fest please. GRRRRRRRRRRR.

Comments are closed.

- Advertisement -

Related Posts

- Advertisement -