WHO WOULD YOU CHOOSE? Brandon Anderson OR Pax Perry?

1. Both.

2. Brandon

3. I like Brandon.

4. Meh. Getting a little over the whole “Active Duty” stuff. Brandon’s been in way too much stuff to be believable as a real “active duty” member of the military and Pax just doesn’t come off as military either–especially not with that salute. (And, more oddly, what’s up with his thighs? They look, well, deformed–almost like someone was applying modeling clay or Play-Doh to a Ken doll.) I’m also not that impressed with Pax’s constant flexing (Brandon’s isn’t impressive either but he’s not shown doing it that much ). Yes, it’s porn and not “real” sex but, honestly, it just looks like Pax isn’t really into the sex as much as he is in showing off his body for the camera. I suppose there are people who like that but, to me, once the sex starts, I like the guys actually getting into the sex. Muscle worship is fine–I do like looking at muscular dudes–but the muscle guy’s flexing isn’t going to be earning any appreciation while I’m sucking his cock or getting fucked or even if I’m lucky enough to fuck him. And I guess that carries over when I’m watching porn that involves muscle worship.
   Alright–essay’s done.

5. re joeynmtgy8’s comment: I’ve never been that into the Active Duty concept and they sets they use for several years; when it started was there an attempt to only use guys on actual duty or recent discharges?
   I generally just try to look past that to the guys and the action, which this time I found to be pretty hot especially in the vid trailer
   I want to fuck Pax and I want to play with Brandon – always thought he was hot

6. *the sets they’ve used

7. Brandon

Comments are closed.