MODEL OF THE DAY: DILLON DIAZ…

-

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

25 COMMENTS

  1. A gorgeous, handsome, well built stud ruined, in my opinion, by the most hideous circumcision scars. Why oh why mutilate something so gorgeous?

    • That is rubbish…..cut or uncut you have the same risk of getting HIV…..the W.H.O. once described homosexuality as a disease so I wouldn’t hold much sway with what they say

    • Utter drivel. HIV is passed in most part by indulging in unsafe sexual practices. Nothing to do with being cut or otherwise.

  2. warwickshire, that is not damage from circumcision, it is a pigment condition called Vitiligo , where loss of pigment happens, most obvious in people of colour.

  3. That is it — do not believe in research. Ignore it! If you have time — check it out — once African men where cut — the hiv rate went down. Being a “purist” will kill you. As the olde saying goes, “Stupid is, stupid does.”

    • Fortunately here in the United Kingdom men are not routinely genitally mutilated other than for religious reasons and HIV rates and rates of other sexually transmitted diseases are no higher than any other developed country. Indeed it is arguably less prevalent than in the United States where there seems to be a predisposition to circumcise.

  4. 10/10 for confidence, not sure about sex appeal. I’d be keeping that wonky dick in my pants if I were him.

  5. Well it seems we can’t please everyone. Some guys would make my heart flutter no matter what their religion. Maybe it’s best to keep up a diversity of men and a varying array of cocks? They come in so many interesting colours, especially when men aren’t plain white bread as I am myself. A mate said “I always forget a name, I often forget a face; but I never forget a dick”.

    Men and their cute bits: can we ever get enough?

  6. I am unable to understand men with foreskin fetish. Usually they are circumcised, and know nothing about the issues caused by too much/too tight foreskin. It is certainly not mutilation; incidence of HIV is proven higher among uncut men; the aesthetic is undeniable, I will not suck a cock whose head never sees the light of day. I just can’t do it. The odour alone precludes it, the head cheese finishes it once and for all. Now I will say that I have not been circumcised, nor have I ever needed it. I am all for natural cocks, if they are healthy. But I still like the look and feel of a cut one.

  7. Can I kindly point out that, rather than having a foreskin fetish, I believe that nature provided the cock with a foreskin for a reason i.e. to protect the glans. As an uncut guy ( I’ve had the best part of 5 decades of pleasure with my foreskin) my glans sees the light of day many times during a 24 hour period as my foreskin is entirely retractable (thanks to parental advice as a child to ease it back gradually during bathing). As for smells, any part of the human body smells if not regularly washed. I’m very well aware of the problems caused by tight foreskin (Balanitis etc) but tight foreskin is often eased here in the UK by a small vertical cut rather than complete removal. As for liking the feel of an uncut cock fair play and good for you. I have a preference for uncut but not exclusively so.

  8. He has the same skin condition as Michael Jackson, Vitilgo. See near the head of his penis, it is loosing some pigmentation and is whiter than the rest.

Comments are closed.

- Advertisement -

Related Posts

- Advertisement -