VICE: After reading a paper from researchers at the University of Toronto, which was released last month, I might have to rethink that, ahem, position. Dr. Nicholas O. Rule and Konstantin Tskhay asked 23 people to guess the sexual inclinations of 200 gay men based on neutral photographs of their faces. Gay men, scientists have shown, tend to self-identify as one of three sexual types: “top,” taking on the insertive role; “bottom,” being a receiver; and “versatile,” enjoying both sexual roles. It’s also been documented that sexual preferences tend to align with stereotypical gender dynamics; in general, tops tend to be dominant and masculine, while bottoms are more inclined to be submissive and effeminate. It seems pretty clichéd if you ask me, but I guess we all have to live under the patriarchy.
The researchers were testing whether there is a correspondence between the physical markers of masculinity, like facial hair and strong features, and self-professed sexual preference. Nicholas and Konstantin’s study gathered pictures of 200 men, half tops and half bottoms, and showed them to 16 men and seven women selected randomly from Amazon’s mTurk. It turned out that even when faces were taken completely out of context, the study participants were able to guess the men’s preferences at a rate better than chance. All this suggests that our desires might not be as private or unpredictable as we like to think.
Or it means jack shit, because the sample size was so insanely small.
READ THE REST HERE @ VICE
And they got paid for conducting this bullshit? 23….and seven were women? Unreal…Sarge, these posts should have the caption of satire. If I’m being honest, this is kinda insulting to our intelligence. It’s like saying big feet equate to equal size cocks. Yeah…no. My shoe/boot size varies between 16 & 17, yes, you read that tight. If that were the case I’d be in porn and sucking my own dick….I wish!!!!
No offense Sarge, just keepin’ it real.
* right
No