Pretty “meh” set. #11 and 12 were the best. And I honestly don’t recall the last time a picture so badly out-of-focus was included in a set. Even though the guy in 15 is a no-go for me, due to the overabundance of ink, that still doesn’t excuse the blurriness of the pic. #3 is also a bit odd–fully clothed, too cropped, even the “package” isn’t really prominent enough to stimulate (it’s almost a “Where’s Waldo” of dick pics).
Not a stellar set. 7 – amazing body, huge arms, thick cock, sexy scruff, 10 – all three, especially the guy in the middle with the smooth ass & 13 – cute guy, sexy scruff, sweet hole, ready to eat.
7 & 12
Pretty “meh” set. #11 and 12 were the best. And I honestly don’t recall the last time a picture so badly out-of-focus was included in a set. Even though the guy in 15 is a no-go for me, due to the overabundance of ink, that still doesn’t excuse the blurriness of the pic. #3 is also a bit odd–fully clothed, too cropped, even the “package” isn’t really prominent enough to stimulate (it’s almost a “Where’s Waldo” of dick pics).
1, 6, and 16
I agree with joey I pass
Maybe 1, 4, 6, guys left and middle in 10, and maybe 11
7 and 16, others could be a yes with a better look.
Not a stellar set. 7 – amazing body, huge arms, thick cock, sexy scruff, 10 – all three, especially the guy in the middle with the smooth ass & 13 – cute guy, sexy scruff, sweet hole, ready to eat.
4 for sure then 5, 7, 10, 12 and 18.
1, 5, 6, 7, 11, 16
I also agree with Joey. Basically, a rotten set. Number 7 has a hot body, but unfortunately, it’s all inked up.
4 8 9 (hell yes ) 16 18
What a hot, sexy body on # 7, shame about the tattoos though.
1,5,9,11,13, and 19.
My favorite is #5! Not a great set!